New Delhi, Dec. 30 -- The Delhi high court has held that directing an individual to provide voice samples for comparison with intercepted phone calls does not infringe the fundamental right against self-incrimination or the right to privacy. The right against self-incrimination guaranteed under Article 20(3) of the Constitution of India protects an accused from being compelled to testify against themselves. A bench of justice Neena Bansal Krishna, in her verdict delivered on December 24, ruled that voice samples constitute mere "material evidence" for comparison purposes and are innocuous in nature, as they do not amount to oral or documentary testimony capable of incriminating the accused. "The direction to provide a voice sample does not ...