U.S., March 5 -- ClinicalTrials.gov registry received information related to the study (NCT06856304) titled 'Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Repair of Congenital Inguinal Hernia' on Feb. 25.

Brief Summary: Background:comparison between percutaneous internal ring suturing vs Conventional Laparoscopic Repair of Congenital Inguinal Hernia in male patients. Methods : this is a prospective randomized study including 109 male patients with 120 CIHs Patients were randomly categorized into two groups. Group A were subjected to laparoscopic disconnection of the hernia sac and narrowing of the internal ring (IR). Group B underwent PIRS. The intended primary outcome was recurrence within 1 year, besides comparing ...