RANCHI, India, July 3 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on June 3: 1. The grievance of the petitioner is that he is the owner of the shop and in the execution proceeding he has filed... Read More
RANCHI, India, July 3 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on June 3: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Chakuli... Read More
RANCHI, India, July 3 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on June 3: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The present application has bee... Read More
RANCHI, India, July 3 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on June 3: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has moved before this Court for grant of privileg... Read More
GUWAHATI, India, July 3 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on June 3: 1. Heard Mr. A.T. Sarkar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. B. Sarma, learned CGC; Mr. M. Islam, l... Read More
GUWAHATI, India, July 3 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on June 3: 1. Heard Mr. R. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S.K. Medhi, learned CGC; Mr. G. Sarma, lear... Read More
GUWAHATI, India, July 3 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on June 3: 1. The instant petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging inter-alia the ac... Read More
GUWAHATI, India, July 3 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on June 3: 1. Heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. S.P. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner... Read More
GUWAHATI, India, July 3 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on June 3: 1. Heard Mr. S. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P.K. Roy, learned Senior Counsel assisted... Read More
GUWAHATI, India, July 3 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on June 3: 1. The subject matter of this writ petition is a claim for family pension. As per case projected, the petitioner is... Read More