PATNA, India, Feb. 25 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on Feb . 4:
We are constraint to reject this application for the reason that there is no specific statement in the body of the petition with regard to the period of delay and then the affidavit apparently appears to have been prepared on a paper on which a LTI was already affixed.
2. The papers and the manner in which typing has been done on the LTI, can be seen from the naked eyes which suggests that it is not a properly sworn affidavit.
3. We thought of imposing some cost upon the counsel of the appellant and taking action against the Advocate Oath Commissioner, but having noticed that the lawyer is only two years old practitioner at the bar, we refrained from doing...