PATNA, India, May 8 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on May 6:
The record taken up on mentioning being made on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent.
3. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 07.04.2018 passed in Title Suit No. 199 of 2016 by the learned Sub Judge-IV, Madhubani whereby and whereunder the petition dated 28.07.2017 filed by the plaintiff/petitioner for amendment in the plaint has been rejected.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned trial court has passed a cryptic order without giving any reasons for rejection of the amendment application of the plaintiff. The amendment was sought prior to commencem...