PATNA, India, Feb. 19 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Feb. 12:
The petitioner, who had participated in the tender, is aggrieved by the decision of the Technical Committee holding him to be unresponsive.
2. The contention of the petitioner is that such decision was taken in confusion. The petitioner had applied for two groups of work and had to deposit documents regarding the ownership of tools and other equipments. For one of the group of works, the tender paper submitted by the petitioner was found to be incorrect and the complaint regarding such deficiency was also verified and found to be correct. However, with the other group of work, the papers submitted by the petitioner were complete in all respects. There was ...