PATNA, India, Aug. 4 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 15:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
I.A. No.01 of 2025
2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner died leaving behind his two sons, namely, Umesh Dubey and Santosh Kr. Dubey. He further submits that Umesh Dubey has sworned an affidavit before the Notary Public that time bound promotion of his father may be given to his younger brother in which he has no objection, and therefore, only younger brother, namely, Santosh Kr. Dubey has filed vakalatnama and requested to make payment to his younger brother.
3. Counsel for the State and Road Transport Corporation are pres...