PATNA, India, May 17 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on April 18:
The petitioner is aggrieved with the blacklisting order, which blacklisting is also for a term of ten years. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that an appeal was filed from the order on 20.07.2023 and the specific contention taken was that the show-cause notice was vague.
2. Considering the fact that an alternate remedy has been availed, we were inclined to reject the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. However, the learned counsel points out that this is not an efficacious remedy since an appeal was filed on 20.07.2023 and it has not been listed till now.
3. In the above circumstances, we direct t...