PATNA, India, April 4 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on March 27:
Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner is aggrieved with the Memo No. 804 dated 23.06.2021 passed by the respondent no. 4 whereby the claim of the petitioner for financial benefit under Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACP) has been turned down by refusing to count his services from his initial appointment, as has been done in the matter of Sri Anil Kumar Singh, Technician, who stands on similar footing.
3. Mr. Anil Kumar Verma, learned Advocate for the petitioner adverting to the facts enumerated in the writ petition has contended that the petitioner was earlier engaged on 18.01.1984 as Water Man on leave vacancy. However, later on he was enga...