PATNA, India, Feb. 20 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Feb. 11:
We have heard Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh, the learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Pratik Kumar Sinha, the learned Advocate for the State.
2. The petitioner has expressed his grievance that despite respondent No. 8 having been debarred earlier by the Department, his tender papers were accepted and he was given the contract.
3. During the course of argument, it was pointed out by the learned counsel for the State that the petitioner himself was held to be technically unresponsive and, therefore, he would not be in a position to challenge the award of contract to respondent No. 8.
The rest of the document can be viewed at https://patnahighcourt.gov.in...