PATNA, India, July 7 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 1:
Heard Mr. Shiv Shankar Prasad Yadav, learned Advocate for the appellant.
2. It appears that the appellant worked under a scheme for cleaning ponds, which was a contractual engagement. The scheme was later withdrawn.
3. All that the appellant wants is that a panel be prepared for all such contractual employees and their names should be included in the aforesaid panel from which appointments on regular basis could be made.
4. We are afraid whether such a prayer can be allowed.
5. In fact, the appellant had claimed before the learned Single Judge that he would be entitled to be enlisted in the panel so that ultimately his name is considered for appointment o...