JABALPUR, India, Oct. 22 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Sept. 23:
Learned counsel for appellant submits that the appellant was never served with the notices issued by the Court and even the service report shows that appellant could not served. However, the impugned order was passed without hearing the appellant, who was the main contesting respondent in the writ court against whom an order has been passed without hearing and he was not even proceeded ex parte by the Court prior to passing of the impugned order.
Issue notice.
Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for writ petitioners i.e. respondents No.1 to 4, the petitioners in the writ petition as also by counsel for respondents No.5 and 6...