JABALPUR, India, May 15 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following April 17:
1. The present appeal is filed on various grounds, however, the maximum claim of the retiral dues, as stated by the writ petitioner, has already been paid. The case of the writ petitioner was that part of leave encashment and gratuity has not been paid.
2. The writ court has observed that the appellant was not unaware of his right at the time when he stood retired in the year 1995. Although he was given extension of one year in service, therefore, effective retirement was in the year 1996. By filing the writ petition in the year 2007, the appellant could have claimed the entire benefits but he withdrew the said writ petition in the year 2011 and again sle...