JABALPUR, India, Dec. 26 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Nov. 26:
Pursuant to our order passed in the morning, respondent no.3 had appeared before the Registrar (Judicial-II) who has noted his presence.
Respondent no.3, is also present in the Court.
Petitioner on behalf of respondent no.3 had impugned the validity of order of detention passed by the Collector for detention of said respondent no.3, detenue under Section 3 of the Prevention of Black Marketing & Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980, though the original order did not mention any period amounted to a detention order for an indefinite period. Reference may be had to Section 13 of the Prevention of Black Marketing & Main...