JABALPUR, India, Nov. 13 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Oct. 13:
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 submits that the bank guarantee has already been encashed and the amount has been credited to the account of respondent No.1 on 08.10.2025 itself.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that he had informed the respondent No.1 as well as the bank about the interim order passed by this Court. However, despite the same, the bank guarantee has been encashed. He submits that since the bank guarantee has already been encashed, he seeks leave to withdraw the petition reserving the right of the petitioner to initiate appropriate action for restitution and other remedy in accordance with law.
In ...