NEW DELHI, April 25 -- Delhi High Court issued the following judgment on March 25:
4. It is appellants' case that respondent no.1 had also instituted
insolvency proceedings against the appellants before the National Company
Law Tribunal [NCLT]. The appellants claim that their challenge to the
impugned award [application under Section 34 of the A&C Act being
OMP(COMM) 18/2021] and the proceedings before the NCLT, were handled
by two different authorised representatives. Thus, the authorised
representative of the appellants who was involved in the proceedings before
the NCLT was not aware of the status of the proceedings instituted for setting
aside of the impugned award. The appellants state that its authorised
representative (Sh. Hare Ram ...