New Delhi, Dec. 3 -- Giving a provocative speech cannot by itself constitute an offence under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), the accused in the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case told the Supreme Court on Tuesday, as the bench granted them one more day to conclude arguments on their bail pleas. A bench of justices Aravind Kumar and NV Anjaria pressed the defence to respond to the core charge - that the speeches were not isolated political expressions but part of a coordinated platform to trigger violence. "The prosecution has alleged that you created a platform to stage violence. How do you get over that?" the bench asked. Imam's counsel Siddharth Dave said, "They need to show apart from the speech, there is something else. I must have met people or done some act. By giving a speech, I cannot be blamed for disrupting supplies as contemplated under Section 15 of UAPA. The court pointed to video clips played in court by Delhi Police in which Imam allegedly spoke about cutting off Assam from the rest of the country and urging protesters to choke supplies....