MUMBAI, July 20 -- Five days remain for feedback on Mumbai's new "iconic buildings" policy before the BMC proceeds to put the idea into action. An idea that was sown around three years ago-which HT first reported about on October 1, 2022-it aims to encourage structures of "architectural excellence" in the city, offering extra FSI as the carrot. Respecting its intent, the policy has nonetheless raised the eyebrows of a few eminent urban planners, architects and cultural doyens of the city. What if the attempt to draw interesting buildings on Mumbai's skyline distorts its already present iconic structures and neighbourhoods, they ask. "Mumbai urgently requires a skyline review process-a body that evaluates how proposed structures affect sightlines, scale and heritage precincts," wrote Shireen Gandhy, director of the city's first gallery, Chemould, in a letter to the BMC, and then turned it into a petition that racked up over 1,000 signatures in a day. "Without this, the "iconic" label may become a licence for vertical excess, even in sensitive areas such as Marine Drive and Fort, where visual harmony is integral to identity." Heritage architect Vikas Dilawari said that the buildings that are considered icons today, such as the CSMT station or Rajabai Tower, had some cohesiveness with the overall planning and design of the neighbourhood. "If the policy is just going to encourage iconic buildings without benefiting the city or regard to the surroundings, everything will stick out like a sore thumb, adding to the Disneyland feeling of it all," he said. Abha Narain Lambah, a conservation architect, had similar concerns. "While there are many areas in Mumbai, like the suburbs, which could use a dose of iconic buildings, I would urge the government to be very careful about approving any structure in historic precincts that might overpower the icons that already stand. The many historic precincts of Marine Drive, Khotachiwadi, Banganga, Gamdevi etc have an intrinsic value arising from their historic footprint and do not need disturbing." The policy is ambiguous on what counts as 'iconic', describing it as any building or space that has a unique or distinctive characteristic. The judge of this will be a BMC commissioner-led committee of six members, consisting of one renowned name each in architecture, visual arts and business, the chief engineer of the Development Plan department and the director of town planning. The commissioner can, if he wishes to, appoint two more experts in architecture and urban planning. Finding this unsatisfactory, Gandhy wrote in her letter, "The framework of the policy is deeply inadequate. Unlike Mumbai's Heritage Committee, which includes civil society experts, architects and historians, the Scrutiny Committee under Regulation 33(27) lacks defined membership criteria, transparency mechanisms or a process of public accountability....