New Delhi, Jan. 29 -- In a curious turn of events, the Supreme Court has decided to hear in person the district mining officer (DMO) of Bageshwar district in Uttarakhand after learning that her statement before the Uttarakhand High Court directly contradicted a report relied upon by the apex court to lift a blanket ban on soapstone mining in the district. A bench of justices Sanjay Kumar and K Vinod Chandran on Wednesday directed Nazia Hassan, the Bageshwar DMO, to remain present before it on February 18, observing that it would "like to know the truth" behind her assertion before the high court that no mining lease had been given a "clean chit" by a committee whose report had, days earlier, persuaded the Supreme Court to allow 29 lease-holders to restart mining operations. The order came while the bench was hearing an appeal filed by the Uttarakhand government against the high court's December 5 and 11, 2025 orders, which had questioned the very foundation of the Supreme Court's November decision lifting the absolute ban on mining. During the hearing, the bench expressed disquiet over the development. "We would like to know the truth. We don't know what is happening in the high court. We don't know whether she was being pressurised one way or the other," the court observed. "Twenty-nine lessees were said to be complying with the norms as per the report, but she later appeared before the high court and said something else," it added....