India, Oct. 10 -- The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) has, in its 100 years, become one of the most powerful cultural and social forces in India. In his centenary address, RSS general secretary, Dattatreya Hosabale, spoke of an India where divisions of religion, birthplace and caste would give way to shared purpose, urging swayamsevaks (volunteers) to "reach all sections of society. to seek cooperation and participation in the mission of national service." Hosabale outlined five pillars for transformation - swadeshi (self-reliance), strong family values, social harmony, ecological consciousness and civic duty. He invoked rashtra dharma (duty to the nation) as an eternal moral duty transcending faith or region, declaring that Indians must dedicate themselves to the nation. The RSS has endured bans, survived suspicion, and transformed into a body capable of shaping the national agenda. It is often misunderstood as merely a socio-political force because of its proximity to the BJP. True, the organisation has expanded dramatically during the years the BJP has been in power, but it flourished even during the long decades of Congress rule. In truth, it is politically agnostic. What it ultimately desires is not office but imprint. In my view, the RSS is a civilisational movement, waging a patient battle for hearts and minds. I write this as someone who was born far from Nagpur, both geographically and metaphorically. I grew up in what is now Jharkhand, cradled in a neighbourhood of Hindus. My earliest memories are of festivals: I splashed colours on Holi, lit lamps on Diwali, and joined the Dussehra pandals. That these were "Hindu festivals" never crossed our youthful minds; for us, they were simply the joyous rhythm of childhood. In return, our Hindu friends came to our homes for seviyan and biryani on Eid, joined our iftars and offered a warmth that knew no name beyond friendship. We prayed, we celebrated and we laughed together. And yet, whispers reached us. Relatives and elders would caution: Beware of the RSS. They said that behind its rhetoric of harmony lay a demand for the submission of our identity. Years later, in 2013, I left behind a successful investment banking career and met Narendra Modi, then the BJP's prime ministerial candidate. He was direct: If I pledged to serve the nation, he would welcome me. I accepted. That decision was scandalous within my community. Many branded me a traitor for joining the very forces they had long distrusted. The hurt was deep, and for a while, I lived as an outcast. But time, as it does, softened the edges. A decade later, those who once shunned me now listen when I say that misunderstandings need not last forever - that suspicion can give way to trust. Still, for many in the community, the paradox remains. To live as a Muslim in India is to live with the weight of proof. They tell me, "We are natives and yet foreigners, citizens and yet suspects". A friend once said, half in jest and half in pain, "How many more times must we prove our love for this rashtra (nation)?" It is in this fragile space that the Sangh's outreach to Muslims becomes significant. The RSS sarsanghchalak (chief), Mohan Bhagwat, has spoken with a conciliatory tone: "From the day Islam came to India, it has been here and it will remain here." These are welcome words, though some in the community still hear inclusivity on the majority's terms. Yet many others take heart. Imam Umer Ahmed Ilyasi, after welcoming Bhagwat, said, "Our DNA is the same; only the form of worship is different." His words reflect a longing for recognition, for suspicion to melt into fraternity. But others, like Asaduddin Owaisi, dismiss such gestures as "hypocritical." Between hope and scepticism, our community drifts, never quite at rest. Yet if we strip away the layers of ideology and fear, we cannot deny our soil. Islam in India was never a foreign intrusion. It seeped through Punjab's villages via Sufi shrines, entered Bengal's poetry where Allah was called Iswara and Prabhu. Crores of people in the Muslim community still carry the surnames of their Hindu ancestors - Bhat, Shah, Cheema, Khokhar, Patel, and many others. To call us outsiders is to deny this truth: We are of this land. We have Hindu ancestry in our DNA, so where is the question of being outsiders? The real question, then, is not whether Muslims belong to India. We always have, and always will. The question is whether the India envisioned by the Sangh can belong to Muslims without demanding the diminishment of their identity. What I see today is a shift, however small. India, at its best, is already a chorus. The task for RSS more than the government now is to make that chorus permanent. Can they do it? I believe they can....