PRAYAGRAJ, May 4 -- Observing that litigants are increasingly turning aggressive towards the judiciary because of the reluctance of judges to use their contempt-of-court powers, the Allahabad high court dismissed a transfer petition due to a lack of evidence to support the allegations levelled against a presiding officer. The court has also imposed a cost of Rs.5,000 on the petitioner. Passing the order, a bench of Justice JJ Munir further observed that while courts hesitate to invoke contempt powers out of respect for the citizens' fundamental right to freedom of speech, this liberal approach cannot be misused to make scandalous allegations against judges. "It is unfortunate that in contemporary times, litigants have turned aggressive because for one reason or the other, the courts are eschewing invocation of their power of criminal contempt. The restraint or the hesitation comes from honouring the citizen's fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression and their right to ventilate their grievances. This does not mean that any kind of scandalous allegations without basis can be hurled at the court and got away with," the court said. The case involved a plea challenging the Board of Revenue's refusal to transfer an application under the UP Revenue Code, 2006, from the additional commissioner (judicial), 3rd, Bareilly, to another court. The petitioner had alleged bias and connivance between the presiding officer and the respondent, citing delays and long adjournments as evidence. However, during the course of hearing, the high court found these claims to be "utterly scandalous" and unsupported by evidence. "A wrong order or a wrong procedure does not lead to an inference of bias. Likewise, mere delay on the part of the presiding officer in hearing the revision is no ground to infer bias," the court said in its order dated April 25. It stressed that accusations of judicial connivance demand a high standard of responsibility and evidence. "To make such an application without any material shows not a sense of freedom to express amongst citizens who are litigants but virtually extreme indiscipline and lack of sense of propriety, to say the least," court observed....