MEERUT, Nov. 18 -- Barely two months after he was released after getting bail in the Quality Bar land encroachment case, senior Samajwadi Party (SP) leader Azam Khan along with his son Abdullah Azam was on Monday was sent back to jail (Rampur) after they were sentenced to seven years' imprisonment each by the special MP/MLA court in Rampur in a 2019 case related to obtaining two PAN cards using different dates of birth. Meanwhile, Azam Khan's legal team, led by advocate Nasir Sultan, said they will challenge the verdict in a higher court. Speaking to media persons outside the Rampur district jail, Azam Khan said, "I do not wish to say anything. They found me guilty and pronounced the punishment. That's alright." While Khan had been released from Sitapur jail on September 23, his son Abdullah walked free from Hardoi jail nine months earlier. In total Azam Khan faces 104 cases. So far, judgments have been delivered in 11 of these cases-six resulting in convictions and five in acquittals. The case was lodged in 2019 by BJP leader Akash Saxena, who accused Azam of getting two PAN cards issued for his son Abdullah using two different birth certificates. Saxena alleged that since Abdullah's real birth date-January 1, 1993-made him ineligible to contest the 2017 assembly election (as he had not turned 25 then), Azam allegedly got another PAN card made showing 1990 as year of his birth. On October 18, 2023, a Rampur court sentenced Azam Khan, his wife Tazeen Fatma, and Abdullah to seven years' imprisonment in a case related to Abdullah's fake birth certificate. In 2017 after Abdullah won the Suar assembly seat of Rampur. BSP candidate Nawab Kazim Ali Khan challenged his age, claiming Abdullah was under 25 at the time of filing nomination. Investigations confirmed the allegation, leading to annulment of Abdullah's election and cancellation of his membership. Azam Khan, his wife and son were jailed in the case. Although Abdullah won again from the Suar assembly seat in 2022, his membership was once more revoked following conviction in a case related to obstruction of government work....