Panchkula, April 30 -- Nearly 12 years after a file related to a plot in Sector 2, Urban Estate, went missing, the Sector 7 police station on Monday registered a case against four employees of the Haryana Shahari Vikas Pradhikaran (HSVP) after a complaint was filed by the estate officer, HSVP, Sector 6, on April 25. The four HSVP employees, who have been named as accused in the case, are then assistants Labh Singh and Jalmed, and then record keepers Gurmukh Singh and Randhir. The case against them has been registered under Section 381 (theft by clerk or servant of property in possession of master) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). According to the FIR, the plot file in question went missing between January 2009 and April 2013. Interestingly, the plot is connected to a corruption case against Colonel BS Goraya (retd), who was found guilty of possessing disproportionate assets by a CBI court in Chandigarh in August 2017. The case against Goraya was initially registered in August 1990 under the Prevention of Corruption Act. As per the CBI case, between January 1, 1987, and August 8, 1990, Goraya, in his own name and also of his family members, had acquired properties valued at Rs.82.6 lakh, of which Rs.72.7 lakh were disproportionate to his known income. The plot was among the 13 properties listed by the CBI in its investigation. These properties were located in prime areas across Chandigarh, Panchkula, Mohali, Gurugram, Delhi and Noida, and included commercial plots, houses and land. The court's ruling was under Sections 13(2) and 13(1) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. According to the complaint, the CBI had issued summons to the custodians of the plot file concerned at the HSVP office on April 3, 2013. However, a search for the relevant case file revealed that it was missing. Subsequently, on April 18, 2013, the then estate officer, HSVP, Panchkula, sent a letter to the then SHO of the Sector 5 police station, requesting the registration of an FIR against the employees responsible for keeping and maintaining the file. However, no FIR was filed at that time. The current complaint emphasises this delay in the registration of the FIR....